__________________________
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Main:
If you have any suggestions for improving the site, complaints about any features, bugs that you've noticed, etc - please list them here.
__________________________
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
If you have any suggestions for improving the site, complaints about any features, bugs that you've noticed, etc - please list them here.
Election Season Improvement
Some color-bars specific to strong candidate supporters might be nice so we can see how things are really breaking out. and how people are identifying themselves.
(That or maybe folks could put their current candidate and strength of commitment in their sig lines?)
Why does that matter?
And don't most folks already have a sense of whom is supporting whom?
__________________________It is the economy, stupid.
Avatars?
I seem to be the only user with an uploaded picture. Unless they are going to be seen with our posts, I don't know why I bother. :-)
The "I can edit any diary" bug still exists. You'd better not upset me or else I'll start editing the open threads to mirror my point of view. :-) (again)
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
huh
How did I miss that bug... I don't remember hearing about it. Weird. I'll check what's going on.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
The banner at the top
should change over to 2008...unless 2007 bears some significance to the site that I'm not aware of....
hehe thanks
I'll change that when I get a chance :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Why have a date at all?
Hopefully our posters are aware of the current year =P
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
that's a good point :)
Though it is a good looking year!
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
And...
And the copyright is still 2007... and still attributed to a non-existent entity.
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
What the heck
do you have against heritage and tradition, man? Sheesh, the next thing you'll want us to do is to take down the Confederate flag or something. ;-)
Just one question:
Is there a way to make posted links here on SC clickable?
Unfortunately it's not automatic
so you have to use the html, like so:
<a href="http://www.cnn.com">Link to CNN</a>
which shows up as:
Link to CNN
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
Copyright clarifications
The copyright notice at the bottom of the page is misleading in several ways.
1) Is all content on the site copyrighted by "Swords Crossed"?
I'd like to think each poster reserves the rights to their posts. This should be clarified. Slashdot's copyright policy is succinct and, I think, should be adopted for SS:
2) "Swords Crossed" isn't a person or entity.
In relation to 1), I'm not so sure "Swords Crossed" could even hold any copyrights since it doesn't really refer to anyone. I suppose the admin team could (whomever owns the servers, pays the bills, etc.) own the copyrights to the layout and design, etc.
And in a tangential concern, I've noticed that some posters (statusquobuster in particular) are copying articles wholesale and posting them as diaries. SC is protected from liability based on the DMCA if a takedown notice is submitted, so there isn't anything legal to worry about, but it's just really bad form. Perhaps a copyright statement should be added to the posting rules.
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
Change
Obviously "SS" was meant to be "SC" in the first point.
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
well
statusquobuster, I believe, is posting his own articles as he is the undersigned man in question. He does the same thing on other blogs, daily kos in particular. However that is a good point in general.
I'll see what I can do :) I think your first suggestion on copyrights being owned by respective posters is right on.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Ditto
Most sites assign copyright of comments to the commenter, and I think that makes the most sense from a legal and from a practical standpoint.
Luckily we don't really have to care about this stuff until we blow up and hit the big time, but might as well be ready for the coming wave of popularity...
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
That very well may be
I didn't really investigate too far. If that is the case, then obviously that isn't a problem.
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
I would propose putting in a # of thread views
counter on each thread. Viewing the comments don't necessarily get to interest level.
Photos aren't changing
I've added a photo, then deleted it, confirmed its been deleted, and added a new one, yet the old one reappears instead of the new one.
__________________________don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33
Unfortunately that's because the old one is still in your cache.
Shift-refresh should force a reload.
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
You are so useful!
don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33
Hey, was your tongue in your cheek when you typed that?
Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
I could make a joke here...
...about the "useful idiots" comments that GoRight makes on occasion...
... but I won't. ;-)
__________________________“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” --- Albert Einstein
Contribute to a better future for Iraq
I recently came across this letter. I belive it is a just cause that every one can contribute to:
Dear Friends,
I am an Iraqi student in computer college of Baghdad University who had to withdraw from university because of disasterous situation in Iraq. My father was kidnapped and we found his body severely tortured. My younger brother is missing for three weeks and everyday we might find his body somewhere.
I appeal to all young people and all honest people to help us. The only way that Iraqi people belive would help us get rid of al-Maliki and his associated militias and agents is a new election.
I came across with the following petition. I ask you to visit this petition for a new election in my country.
I appreciate your concern.
Ahmad Mansoor
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/iraq789/petition.html
a lot in the open threads
I was surprised to discover how much content there is in the daily open threads. They seem to hold the majority of the comments. That's unfortunate for me, because I typically don't pay attention to open threads. I prefer more focused discussions...but I guess open threads are a sort of community-building thing.
I don't get many points for contributing to social capital
.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
that is fairly usual for us
discussing current events. However we might want to promote more thoughtful diaries to the FP to get those more focused discussions fired up :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
I don't know , Ender.
John has been writing some interesting front pagers on economics and other issues that haven't generated much comment.
__________________________If you really believe this is the "fight of our lives," how come you're not in Iraq?
yeah, I know
That was actually going through my mind earlier today.
I sometimes envision people reading them and just coming away with a semi-blank stare and a quick shrug of the shoulders. That may or may not be accurate. who knows.
I don't know if the stuff comes across too heavy or what.
I do know that I am more into issues and ideas than E!-Style political gossip and see a lot of commenting on such topics. If that's what gets people's juices going, that's fine. I'm not complaining.
I don't want people to leave a comment just for its own sake so I've been thinking to change it up a bit and posting lighter (more fluffy) content.
We'll see.
I admit to coming away from the Marx one with a blank stare :-)
This one here. My "kitchen table" level of economic unerstanding did not allow me to contribute to that discussion substantively, but some other people commented on that one, so there you are :-)
Everybody has to post on what interests them and let the chips fall where they may. I find you to be an interesting and thoughtful contributor, and agree with you at least partially most of the time.
yeah,
that one was a little heavy. But I felt so strongly about what I read that I just exploded on that story.
I do actually read a lot about economics and the history economic thought.
I absolutely cannot stomach Karl Marx. The labor theory of value is so devastatingly stupid and wrong that I couldn't pass it up.
There are some really really bad economic ideas, fallacies and totally bogus and bunk "logical constructs" out there and they persist and it really triggers my libertarian monster.
Well, John
It reminded me that Marxism became as heavy as Scholasticism, with every sentence scanned for doctirnal purity, and discussion actually devolving into fine curlicues meant, it seems, to hide the meaning even from the Marxists themselves.
One certainly needs to learn marx-ese to get along.
But lest you think that heaviness had anything to do with it, at last entirely, I will note that I put some lighter personal observations on that thread as sort of a counterbalance, and garnered no response.
I sort of took that as a message. Today, I look at the front page articles and as soon as I see any mean-spiritedness or charge taken as true without evidence, I leave the site. (Today it was the notion that the administration didn't tell us about Pat Tillman, as if Bush called the sergeant on the ground and told him to make up a better story.)
Over the years, I have come to believe my original instincts, and to prefer Marx' earlier writings, which, despite his protestations, show the influence of both his analytical genius and German Romanticism. Next to these writings, Das Kapital seems as dry as pebble shaken in a dry gourd. (thank you, Robinson Jeffers.)
In my case I am just not AS interested in the econ thing.
That is not a criticism, though. I do read them occasionally and weigh in but I find that, while you may not appreciate this, we tend to view the econ thing alike and you do a better job of explaining it than I could. So I leave that to you to keep setting people straight on that front.
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
same here mostly
though I am probably more interested in Economics (similarly to PF) I too agree with John on most related issues and find it hard to add much :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
yes, but, Ender
I figure the more left o center members would engage such issues but it's hit or miss a lot times.
Alright, starting tomorrow I'll try to engage more on econ.
But you need to pick a non econ topic once in a while! :)
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
Ditto
Although I am perhaps a bit more interested than GoRight in economics, I find that I agree and cannot add anything of real substance, so I don't.
Some weeks we are just more active than others.
And GoRight, that green, it's just so wrong. . . .
__________________________don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33
LOL But I am so concerned about the Global Warming debate.
Isn't that green? :)
It's CLC's fault. I can't use the same color as he does. I know it's silly, but hey that's how I feel.I'll switch back in a day or so.EDIT:
There, I switched back. I don't want to let CLC tear down all of my hard work at iconifying the color red around here! Not that I was the only one, the team may be small but I guess we have made a name for ourselves and can suffer a fool like CLC riding our coat tails. He he.
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
agreed.
I can't get used to that color on him. "right" and the color green just don't go together.
GR, just go back to the red dress...PLEASE.
I think it is
a quantity thing. Your posts are thoughtful and deserving of attention, but many of them deal with the same basic topic, just repackaged in different ways. Plus you are prolific, maybe too prolific, but that is not a complaint. I have a hard time reading all of the posts anymore; forget about commenting on them.
thanks for the comments.
I'll keep them in mind. Though, I must say I don't see the same basic topic....unless you mean economic issues...which is pretty broad...like the middle east.
The problem for there is that I'm so fed F'in fed up with Iraq. I was against it before it started and have just grown so disgusted with it. It looks way too simple to me and I see the details of the day to day noise as being so throughly uninteresting and pointless. But hey, that's just me. I have been known to post an occasional post or comment on the nauseating matter.
I'll try to change things up.
true
though that doesn't mean we don't read it. I don't have a good answer. We obviously are a pretty small blog so I think we simply need more people for more topics to be discussed. John has helped liven up the place :)
Suggestions on increasing participation are always welcome.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
voter registration widget
You may be interested in this voter registration widget from Working Assets
:
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
got it
thanks. I added it to the list of upgrading things to do. :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
I can recommend my own diary!
Is this bad form, or expected?
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
It's both!
We've all done it at least once ("hmmm, what does this do? Oh damn.")
But once you know what that little R button does . . . .well, that's different ;}
Hopefully that will be fixed in the next version of the site.
__________________________don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33
You know, I've never had a problem with people rec'ing their own
posts. I know it's generally considered bad form and I don't do it myself when I post elsewhere but I'm fine with it here, since (a) it's not disallowed by the software and some people already do it and (b) sometimes people are particularly interested in making sure something they wrote gets maximum visibility.
If everyone recs every little thing they write then it becomes pointless but if authors are judicious about recommending their own work then I don't see any problem with voting (the best of) your own stuff up.
Just my personal opinion, of course.
Edit: another option is to mention your diary in an open thread and invite people to come comment. Bonus points if the topic relates to something being discussed in the open thread and you successfully move the discussion from within the 200+ comments where it would be hidden to a location easily identifiable, accessible and compartmentalized!
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
hehe
I might have to use a different mechanism for recommending stuff if it's not fixed... Anyways, this Friday night! I decided to forgo doing more on the test server (I'll backup the data of course) and just experiment with new stuff on the live :) So stuff might change around through this weekend.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
newbie
Hi guys. I've been active here for a few days and I think this place looks great. It's a great idea, and I like a lot of aspects of the interface.
Regarding the interface I have a few comments/requests regarding the interface:
1) Could you tell me what system you use? It looks like Drupal, but I couldn't find an acknowledgment anywhere. I think it's nice to note the system somewhere (in the footer or the "about us" section) both to give credit to the developers and let others know what system is being used in case they ever want to set up a website.
2) With the "Ideology" setting, it would be nice to have a note of the fact that this setting determines the color of the bar above your comments, and also which colors go with which ideology.
3) I had a hard time finding the "recommend" buttons. Even after I knew they existed, I couldn't find them. Perhaps in the FAQ section for "popular diaries" you could place the "recommend" icon so users know what to look for. On top of that, the "Popular Diaries" header (on the right) could link to the appropriate section of the FAQ (maybe have a little "FAQ" link to the right of the label). Same for the "X recommends" label at the bottom of diaries.
4) For the "new diary" page, it would be nice to have a note describing how to select multiple tags. I figured out how to do it only because I'm very familiar with computers.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
cool, thank you for the suggestions Adam
Actually as I just posted a minute ago - I will be upgrading us from Drupal 4.7 to Drupal 5.2 next weekend and we will take all your recommendations into account.
Ideology colors will be explained and FAQ will be updated. Hopefully the site will run more smoothly :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
default ideology
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't know that Drupal had a major release. I may take a look at it. Is it easier to manage?
Another thought: I seem to recall that the default ideology was Anarchism. Would "neutral" be better--or do you just figure that no-one is really an anarchist, so it doesn't matter?
BTW, is that quote from me (AR)?
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
hehe
As for Drupal an even newer major release is supposed to come out this fall - 6.0 but it will probably be sometime in the winter when it will start being presentable enough with all the plugins updated.
The 5.x is supposedly faster, smoother, and yeah perhaps easier to manage. From what I've seen it is a good improvement over 4.x and a lot more modules.
Yeah that quote is from you, when did you say it? :)
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
doesn't sound like me
That's odd, it doesn't really sound like me. If I wanted to express that opinion, I would have said something like "People suck, and some people suck more than others."
I think you may have gotten me mixed up with Ayn Rand.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
I like the active discussions box
Good stuff.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
thanks
Perhaps I can modify it to be slightly more descriptive. But it seems useful for the times when someone comments on an old thread.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Hey!!!
How about adding a chatroom to this site? Would that be possible. I think adding a chatroom to this site would be cool.
yup
the new version can have that... That is a great idea.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
IRC??
It'd be much more simple to have someone man an IRC channel and throw a link to it on the front page somewhere.
__________________________I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
That's a good idea too
We could have specified times if people wanted to chat.
Although it seems like Second Life (and the meetups purpleface has been organizing) sort of serves that purpose for a significant fraction of people here.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
that is simple to do
but not as convenient since you have to get people to either go to a different page, or to use MIRC software or whatever.
There are actual plugins to this software that have simple chatrooms... Might be easier.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
On a separate note, Ender ...
How hard would it be to provide a page that gave me access to ALL of my comments rather than the abbreviated set now available on the my account page?
I REALLY REALLY would like to have that. Searching this site for old material that I know exists is a REAL pain. My only acceptable method is to go back through my comments to find it but once they fall off the end of that list I am screwed and have to sometimes resort to a linear search back through the open threads manually.
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
I am looking at that bud n/t
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Are old dairies
lost forever? Or are they still in the cache?
I would like to read some of my old dairies. Some of them I linked to other sites and it comes up now as blank.
__________________________It is the economy, stupid.
old diaries
are still there. They are not coming up in search? Check that. If not, remind me when I get back from vacation - this coming Monday.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
The search for truth vs argument for the sake of it (To Ender)
Ender, is there any way to add a check box or something to a comment or thread so we can label it as an attempt to come to a conclusion vs competitive debate?
I've noticed a lot of the nastiness comes up when people who feel very strongly about something, often on a personal level end up in a discussion with someone who is merely trying to keep someone's point at bay with technicalities or (very unlikely) alternative interpretations. It might keep things a bit calmer if people actually had a way to advertise the difference.
(Much of my discussions with GR and MS being examples)
Another idea along these lines
Have a check box for "rant" with the idea being that people can blow off steam about politics in general without having to defend every statement against the honorable opposition. A "rant" post would be understood as hyperbole and personal opinion and it would be poor form to subject it to rigorous fact-checking or cross-examination. Naturally the target of a "rant" could not be other users here, and posting rules regarding no profanity would still apply.
Just another thought to make it easier for all types of participants to share the same sandbox.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
yes
that would be another type of the labels I'll try to implement :) Sounds very good
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Great idea
although I would phrase it somewhat differently. Maybe call it a "point of order" checkbox to signify a desire to contest/correct a particular statement without arguing the general ideology or overarching idea. Then after the date in the comment it could say "PoO" so we know what kind of post it is... heh.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
I am thinking of
a few labels that could be applied only by the user adding the particular comment. There would be a choice that you can check off before submitting or while editing a comment and it would display to the right of the title.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
sounds potentially doable
on the new version of this software. I'll scour all the suggestions here as well as any new requests while I work on it.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
I humbly submit a request
for a new site in the "Blogs we Like" section under either
"Other" or a new "Libertarian" label. BTW, if you were to choose the latter, The Agitator and Volokh C would fit under that label as well.
That site is The Liberty Papers
, an excellent site from a libertarian perspective. I say "a" libertarian perspective because there are many. But Liberty Papers is quite good with very informed opinions on the day's issues. it's a worthy addition.
Just today are great pieces on Cheney and Eminent Domain.
Looks good
Gimme a few minutes.
Edit: added Liberty Papers under a new "Libertarian" section, and added Michael Yon under "Other" because I thought it should have 3 links also.
Appreciate the suggestion, and if anyone has further ideas please post.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
Thanks.
it's a good site. I hope people refer to it often. Understanding the broad range of libertarian ideas and POVs is important...not only for people to discover their "inner libertarian" but also to get liberals and conservatives to see this underrepresented group of people in terms of emotions, ideas and goals. Making the bases consider ideas, rhetoric and perspectives that appeal to such people is a key to broadening the tents and perhaps discovering new policies to champion.
I feel the eminent domain article there today is a powerful indictment and offers the Left a fresh perspective on minorities and how big-government-power policies can hurt them. It also opens up a different POV on government power as it relates to big business. Often times, much of what we decry about big cold businesses is really a matter of government empowerment. And since shutting them out of government is not practical or really possible for many reasons, the real solution is then to weaken the tools they use.
A small suggestion
Kudos Ender for the way you have brought the site together, it is much easier to get about in because of so many little details.
I do have a small suggestion. I hit more on the recent diaries and got basically the same list with more pages to pick for older posts, but because it started at the top, the bottom was not halfway down the page to its equivalent.
Since when picking more, that is what one wants, could you not scroll 2 or even several pages of list per page? Personally if I have a choice to either scroll or jump pages I would rather scroll (usually assigning the highest number possible, such as on Google). Perhaps others have a different Idea?
__________________________The Self Made Man is just not admitting where he got all the parts.
Is there already a way to do this?
I would really like to have a way to go to a page that gives me a list of all of my comments regardless of thread. The "My Account" page sort of does this at the bottom but it only contains a limited amount of history.
I would like a way to go back over my comments even days and weeks earlier. I frequently find myself trying to reference something that I already posted but if it was from a while back I need to manually go back through the front page articles and use the IE search page by page to find what I want.
If there isn't already such a mechanism available, can we get one easily?
__________________________Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
let me see
what I can do. Have you tried using the SC search? Maybe I can give people a link to a page with more comments... Not sure yet.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Question:
Would it be possible to make it so that if a poster wishes to start a new thread/diary on one of the given Special Topics catagories here on SwordsCrossed, that s/he would be able to do so? Just a suggestion/question.
well
you definitely can do a new diary on almost any topic, including the ones covered by the special topic threads.
Special Topic threads are just there permanently for longer and multiple discussions.
So if I understand you correctly, you can do a new diary on philosophy, religion, science, or whatever you wish.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Database issues?
When I click on the comments in the front page left column, and when I click on the "X new comments" links, I am no longer taken to the actual comment. I end up on the right screen, but several lines below (I think always below) the actual comment.
__________________________don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33
strange
I don't get that... It seems to be going to the correct comment all the time (first new comment for the X new comments as well)... Anyone else having this problem?
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Suggestion--On the upper left
of the main page, you have a section for NEWS, but it's just very old new stories. I understand that upkeep of a NEWS section requires time and effort. However, having a news section with old stories may give the impression to those who visit that the site itself is not up-to-date. I suggest you eliminate that section altogether.
__________________________name the enemy, win the war
I agree
since we have an open thread every day there's no need for the news section. It's a cool feature in theory but I think you're right.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
Polls
Is it possible to have a poll type setting that measured a persons attitude about things (similar to the libertarian test) that a person could show their score and talk about it?
The creator of the poll would have questions with a -4 to +4 answer and then identify in the calculation whether a plus four would add or subtract 4 from the total so:
Q1 Hillary Would be a great president
Q2 the Clintons are involved in a crime ring
Would be measured in opposite directions as a +4 in one would likely get a -4 in the other.
A realistic measure of political thinking say(as that is what the site is about) should mean that I would be as proud of a -30 if Bush would score +50 as I would be of the reverse.
__________________________The Self Made Man is just not admitting where he got all the parts.
Traffic Up?
I got a specific error message this morning that I'm passing on here:
User swordscr_ender has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connection
__________________________don't ask me, I'm just improvising
Political Compass Score: Econ L/R -0.12 Social Lib/Auth -1.33