Wednesday Open Thread

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nietzsche chuckles

WASHINGTON — The military trainers who came to Guantánamo Bay in December 2002 based an entire interrogation class on a chart showing the effects of “coercive management techniques” for possible use on prisoners, including “sleep deprivation,” “prolonged constraint,” and “exposure.”

What the trainers did not say, and may not have known, was that their chart had been copied verbatim from a 1957 Air Force study of Chinese Communist techniques used during the Korean War to obtain confessions, many of them false, from American prisoners.

The recycled chart is the latest and most vivid evidence of the way Communist interrogation methods that the United States long described as torture became the basis for interrogations both by the military at the base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Welcome, comrade, to the glorious revolution against the terrorist swine!

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

Or how to cheat on your homework

so you have more free time.

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

Reservoir Dogs and The Great Chicago Fire.

The 1957 article from which the chart was copied was entitled “Communist Attempts to Elicit False Confessions From Air Force Prisoners of War” and written by Albert D. Biderman, a sociologist then working for the Air Force, who died in 2003. Mr. Biderman had interviewed American prisoners returning from North Korea, some of whom had been filmed by their Chinese interrogators confessing to germ warfare and other atrocities

See, these techniques get people to talk. so these techniques work.

__________________________

In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,

………… parent

Feelin' any better Ender?

I have to admit getting a kick out of yesterday's psychadelic montage. Hope you weren't fritzed by it.

…………

yeah, though it might be too soon to say

I think I am getting better. The next couple of days should show.

__________________________

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Appeals Court in DC issues first habeas ruling for gitmo

prisoner. "It's devastating to the Bush administration. The unanimous opinion even mocks Bush & Co.'s argument, comparing it to a nonsense poem by Lewis Carroll": favicon

"The documents repeatedly describe those activities and relationships as having "reportedly" occurred, as being "said to" or "reported to" have happened, and as things that "may" be true or are "suspected of" having taken place. But in virtually every instance, the documents do not say who "reported" or "said" or "suspected" those things. Nor do they provide any of the underlying reporting upon which the documents' bottom-line assertions are founded, nor any assessment of the reliability of the reporting. Because of those omissions, the Tribunal could not and this court cannot assess the reliability of the assertions in the documents. [...]We merely reject the government's contention that it can prevail by submitting documents that read as if they were indictments or civil complaints, and that simply assert as facts the elements required to prove that a detainee falls within the definition of enemy combatant. To do otherwise would require the courts to rubber-stamp the government's charges..."

And let's remember that the DC Court of Appeals is just about the most conservative packed Appeals Courts out there. I guess there is hope for our judicial system yet. Not accepting "It's true because I say it's true" is the first step towards government by adults, not by children. The idea that any Attorney representing the United States would make a claim like this is just completely astounding. But I then remember that I'm talking about the bush43 Administration. Then it all makes sense again.

…………

Hitchens on being waterboarded

Whatever you think of the man or the method, you will gain information from this article favicon and the accompanying video.

Edit: put this in the "Of interest" block on the right nav bar.

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

I have mixed feelings about it, but

I think it's worth discussing the four bullet points he makes at the end of his article (edited for space):

1. Waterboarding is a deliberate torture technique and has been prosecuted as such by our judicial arm when perpetrated by others.

2. If we allow it and justify it, we cannot complain if it is employed in the future by other regimes on captive U.S. citizens...

3. It may be a means of extracting information, but it is also a means of extracting junk information...

4. It opens a door that cannot be closed...

While I agree with these points, I don't think anyone's ever doubted them. The debate over whether waterboarding is torture seems a little disingenuous to me, since the detractors already think it's torture and the defenders don't care if it is. What we're really discussing is whether torture is warranted, and those who think it is already have responses to points 2, 3, and 4: 2) they already torture our prisoners, so this notion of safeguards is ridiculous; 3) there's no credible study done to support this one way or the other, and 4) who cares? Bring on the thumbscrews!

Okay, I'm being a little hyperbolic there, but correct me if I'm wrong: haven't we heard these defenses from people who don't think waterboarding isn't a moral and ethical wrong? I'm just wondering what Hitchens' article accomplishes, apart from convincing him.

I suppose that's valuable in itself, but still.

Anyway.. .thoughts?

__________________________

Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce

………… parent

I think there is widespread agreement on (3)

Even proponents of the method concede that it (and torture in general) can and often does yield bad intelligence. The key is to cross-check as much as possible and, I suppose, to follow up by providing "punishment" if the detainee gives false information. That's my impression from discussions on RS.

With respect to (4), I agree with you somewhat -- there's no particular physical or moral reason to draw the line at waterboarding. But *culturally* all the debate has defined it as a bright line. I actually think there are many people who don't want to engage in "torture" but who do want to engage in "enhanced interrogation" and so classifying waterboarding does matter. Is there some way to find out whether defenders of waterboarding consider it torture, and if not if they would revise their stance if they were convinced it were?

This is a tough topic to discuss dispassionately... which is good, really. Kudos to Hitchens for removing it from the realm of the theoretical and abstract, anyway.

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

Even proponents of the

Even proponents of the method concede that it (and torture in general) can and often does yield bad intelligence.

Just ask John McCain.

__________________________

In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,

………… parent

Obviously. There is only one conclusion to draw.

Hitchens is an Islamofascist pinko commie.

Jack Bauer would have him admitting to bombings and hijackings in no time.

………… parent

Bill Kristol as seen through the eyes of Tom Tomorrow

in This Modern World. favicon

Oh the horrors! Can this really be how it ends?

…………

Everybody comment for skymutt

Let's get this open thread packed with fascinating discussion!

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

Military kids

CNN article here favicon:

Jordan has moved 10 times in the last three years, but his most unsettling news came when his mother recently sat him down and asked, "How would you feel about your dad going to Iraq?"

"My heart kind of dropped. I was like, 'Wow,'" the 15-year-old boy told CNN.

His stepfather, Marine Gunnery Sgt. Lester Williams, 35, is preparing for his first deployment to Iraq and told his stepson that he needs to be strong over the next year.

My wife reads some boards about babies and showed me a picture yesterday of a returning soldier who was meeting his new baby for the first time.

The military life has got to be tough on families under the best of circumstances.

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

I thought this was an interesting article (for raising blood

pressure)

Obsessive fuel savers risk safety for economy favicon

I think calling 911 upon seeing such behavior is warranted.

__________________________

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

…………

In addition to safety

I'm willing to wager that these hypermilers actually hurt the average mpg gallon used by the motorist around them. They might be saving fuel for their car but raising consumption for everyone around them.

How many motorist gun their engine in anger to pass a slow moving hypermiler that was holding them up?

__________________________

In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,

………… parent

I know I do

Although sometimes I feel bad afterwards especially if it turns out to be some poor old guy.

__________________________

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Metrics

U.S. terror fears at post-9/11 low, poll shows - Whatever you think of President Bush, he's done a great job of safeguarding our country.

What metric would you like to use to measure that? Number of deaths caused by terrorist action during various presidential watches? Property damage?

Seems like from an objective view Bush's tenure has actually been our worst ever in terms of suffering damage from terrorists.

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

I thought 9/11 occurred during the bush43 presidency...

or did the history re-writers now declare that it occurred during Clinton's term?

………… parent

Spore and SecuROM

The computer game industry has been taking a page from the music industry.

Unfortunately that page is titled "How to alienate your customers and shoot yourself in the foot. Repeatedly."

The last few years we've seen increasingly intrusive and obnoxious efforts by computer game industries to prevent piracy. Requirements that you be online to authenticate every time you play or every few days as well as anti-piracy software that is drastically intrusive in terms of your computer OS and personal information are becoming standard for big name titles.

Which is stupid since such measures only serve to given very good reason to pirate the games so as to avoid them.

Personally I have no regard for the concept of Intellectual Property. Consequently whether I buy the retail version of a game/music/movie or get a much cheaper pirated cop[y generally depends on how much I want to support the specific industry. Crap like SecuROM makes it much more likely I'll get myself a pirate copy of Spore instead of paying to give myself bigger hassles.

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

How do you overide the serial number though?

Please forgive me if that's passe as I haven't bought a computer game in probably a decade. Don't they all come with pre-loaded serial numbers that they load up to the "hive" web-site to register the product. And yes, you will be assimilated when that happens. Believe it! (hey it works for some political classes to believe absurd mutterings on the internet).

………… parent

I think

that either somebody cracks the generation algorithm, or else people just post their codes.

Every now and then in a game I play you see people kicked for "duplicate key" and I assume it's because two people are trying to play simultaneously using the same serial number.

But I don't buy games very often so that may not be accurate.

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

Personally I'm not up on how crackers do it

I just know that every security software in the last ten years has been followed within months by a crack that negates it.

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

spore looked pretty amazing

when I first heard of it... It was so long ago. What the heck. Many people stopped waiting.

__________________________

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Will Wright

I've learned not to get caught up in the hype that surrounds Will Wright's games.

Don't get me wrong, I think the guy is talented and I really respect that he tries new things. It's just that the hype gets completely out of control so that the ultimate product disappoints.

Consequently I'm almost certainly going to try Spore, but I'm not dying for it. ;)

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Do we have a Keystone Kops Administration or what?

You might have seen today's WaPo article by David Iglesias titled Spy Games in Iran favicon. But what's even more astounding is the Iran Captures U.S. Spies favicon article where it says:

"He said the Iranians had recently captured several dissident Iranian operatives who had been recruited by U.S. military officers inside Iraq and then sent into Iran. The Iranians, whose intelligence network inside Iraq is pervasive, surveilled the meeting, then followed the agents across the border and seized them."

Then he links to a Christian Sceince Monitor article by Shlomo Ben-Ami (ex Israeli Foreign Minister) and Trita Parsi favicon who say serious diplomacy, not military action, will bring regional security" to the Middle East:

"Even the most successful bombing raid would leave Iran with some nuclear capability. At best, proponents of this option admit, bombing would set back the [nuclear] program five years. During that time the [White House] expectation is that the Iranian people miraculously would unseat the country's ruling clergy and dismantle the nuclear program permanently."

We are being led by children I tell ya.

…………

Oregon gearing up for hybrids

Portland General Electric has begun leading the charge for mass adoption of plug-in hybrid-electric cars in Oregon.

The utility plans to install 12 electric-vehicle charging stations in Portland and Salem by September as part of a demonstration project to develop the transportation infrastructure needed to support electric vehicles. The project will also help the utility anticipate the demand plug-in cars might place on the region’s electric grid and design smart grid systems to help even out variability in wind and solar resources.

“We’re not creating a new division or a new product; we’re preparing for what might become a sea change in the electric vehicle market,” said Bill Nicholson, vice president of customers and economic development for PGE. “As we understand how manufacturers are going to deploy these vehicles, we’ll know better if it becomes a huge focus of our utility or if it will be delayed based on the manufacturer response.”

PGE is working with the Oregon Department of Transportation and other partners on the demonstration project, which will design standards for charging stations and develop a public awareness campaign to prepare for mass adoption of plug-in cars over the next two to five years.

“The biggest drawback for people considering switching to electric vehicles is the range of those vehicles and having certainty about being able to charge up if they’re going to travel,” said Art James, a project director with ODOT’s Innovative Partnership Program. “If we could establish a network where they can top off the charge, we’ll facilitate adoption.”

About 400 electric cars are registered in Oregon, comprising slightly more than 1 percent of all cars in the state, according to the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles. But ODOT anticipates electric car ownership will grow dramatically in the next two to five years when manufacturers begin mass producing plug-in hybrids.

Story

The statement that there are 400 hybrids and that is 1% of cars in the state is an error. Oregon has 4 million motor vehicles, not 40,000. I can't say whether the error is the 400 number or the 1% number. Hopefully the former.

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

Hey, check it out. They are trying to ban me from GW articles.

On Wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_Comments/GoRight

:)

Who knows what's gonna happen.

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

…………

Congrats

I am sure you are driving them insane as the King of Painful Detailed Sophisms.

" When confronted with his misbehavior, GoRight at denies being disruptive and also denies participating in edit warring, despite all evidence to the contrary. He later claims that his edits were properly sourced and their reversion is evidence of a conspiracy against him. When notified of this RFC, he bizarrely described it as "forum shopping"."

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

Heh. You have to really understand how incredibly biased

Raul is to understand that properly. :) In normal people speak that translates to, yea GoRight is argumentative at times, but he usually has a point.

Another example is that my behavior well claiming he was forum shopping is considered "bizarre".

Here's my response:

Raul has a tendency to create a toxic atmosphere which is not conducive to WP:CIV favicon debate. He frequently labels things a "bizzare", "pseudoscience", "crackpottery", etc. even when such characterizations are unfounded. To find an example we need look no further than this very RFC. Above, he labels my charge of this RFC being an example of WP:FORUMSHOP favicon as being "bizarre". But is it really? To quote from WP:FORUMSHOP favicon, "This also includes bringing up the same issue on a number of forums in succession (e.g. the village pump, RFC, admin board, deletion discussions, etc.) because the debate on the first forum did not yield the result you wanted." Raul took his case against me to the WP:ANI favicon as acknowledged above, didn't get the answer he wanted, and then ran right over here the create an RFC against me. The WP:ANI favicon is forum #1. This WP:RFC favicon is forum #2. You decide if my claim is "bizarre" as Raul would have you believe. And yet he still insists that he understands the rules and policies and that I don't, further contributing to the toxic environment he engenders.

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

After having full experience of your unbiased POV

and after getting an enormous headache from reading a few of the threads and comments, let me just state that I agree with Raul.

I don't think the Wiki has any choice but to ban you!

Does your wife ever win an argument with you?

(Have you noticed that Bush is talking about closing Gitmo? And started talking in diplomatic terms on Iran? *gasp* Could it be that the East (China, Asia, Russia, Iran) has foisted economic blackmail on the West by winning the oil wars? Tons of US dollars ship overseas, while the US economy weakens further. Who could have predicted?)

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

Before you get your hopes up ...

I think that this is nothing but a bluff charge by Raul. Note the boilerplate at the top of the page. Two users have to certify this or it will simply be deleted. Note that not even Raul has certified it down below. :)

Raul knows these processes very well, so he knows that this will simply be deleted when the timer expires unless he and one other person certify it, and he also knows that his write up is far too broad to meet the criteria at the top regarding this being this being a SINGLE incident. Even so, it was a shot across the bow.

It is a useful exercise for me, however, because it points out my weaknesses should an actual RFC be presented in earnest and gives me a chance to bolster my position. It will also give me another notch against him in my case for harassment. I'm not sure he considered that aspect, but in reality I don't think he would care either way.

Still, the politics over there are just like the politics over here. So much for wikipedia being "neutral".

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

Yes, but we wouldn't ban you

for critiquing global warming =)

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

'nuetral'

No chance with you there.

Which is why I vote for your banning! Out with GoRight.

Should I start a blog and a web campaign "Liberate GoRight from The Wiki? :)

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

LOL. :)

Now why wouldn't that surprise me?

Note the comments on the discussion page here favicon and here favicon. I have evidence that Raul, who is an administrator there, simply created this page by hand in his own area and then moved it under the official area, see this favicon. Now that in and of itself is not that significant, but given this this was never listed as a candidate page here, it is obvious that he is not serious and is just playing games and abusing his admin privileges in the process.

He assumes that the page will disappear and all tracks will be erased when it does. But Wikipedia has an export page feature and I am saving snapshots every so often for future evidence. This will be useful in the future as it simply adds one more nail to his harassment coffin.

He relies on being knowledgable and having admin access to snowball the average user. I am not the average user, however. Time is on my side if he persists.

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

For me at least I enjoy you & you drive me crazy,

sometimes separately and sometimes at the very same time.

What's funny in this case is that you are using a logic/philosophy modus that is perfectly acceptable on right leaning sites but is not accepted by other sites.

Justifying your views using that as your argument holds no merit in their eyes because there is no there there as far as they are concerned.

That's exactly why I think you are entertaining and exasperating.

………… parent

I'm glad I am entertaining you! :)

What's funny in this case is that you are using a logic/philosophy modus that is perfectly acceptable on right leaning sites but is not
accepted by other sites.

Justifying your views using that as your argument holds no merit in their eyes because there is no there there as far as they are concerned.

But I am not sure I understand your point above. (No pun intended)

Can you please expand it a bit?

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

You come to the debate

with a foregone conclusion, then try and use your POV to prove your POV with questionable sourcing.

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to.

That is just like the arguments here. You agree with their POV so you see it as they do. No different than, say, arguing about Obama. :)

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

The Wiki is

not supposed to be about POV, it is supposed to be nuetral.

Your suggestion that arguing about Obama is the equivalent of posting on an information page betrays that your position is political and not nuetral, or you wouldn't have brought it up.

Yes you should definitely be banned from posting on the Wiki. I vote to have your IP address blocked.

Here you can say what you want and it is not taken as sourced fact.

__________________________

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

I'll expand. You do source your points but the sites you use

to back up some of your points are web sites that some folks feel aren't accurate. So even though you can point to other sites to verify your points of view and claims, some of those sites make claims that aren't peer reviewed and scientifically accepted.

To put it in terms that you can relate to, you feel many of the claims made by Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" aren't backed up because you don't accept the statements and conclusions made by it's "experts". Same thing in this case but it's others and what they think of your "experts".

That whole peer review thing.

………… parent

So are you talking about the Earthquake thing that

started this whole mess? :)

That was obviously a pointy stick even though I had a source for it. They knew it and I knew it. There is a small group of editors there than maintain the status quo on the GW pages. William M. Connelley, Stephan Schulz, and Kim D. Petersen mostly but Raul chimes in from afar often enough to be annoying.

I've got a tiger by the tail there, it seems, with Raul. He is powerful and has friends in powerful places. The handwriting is on the wall, I am afraid. I was hoping it was just a shot across the bow but I guess not.

We'll just see how this plays out, but I am less optimistic at this point. Banning me wouldn't be a bad thing, actually, since it will keep me from wasting time being ineffective at combating the blatant biases there. My changes are, for the most part, erased. I have won a few battles here and there but not on anything that they cared significantly about. If they care about it you can't win. That's reality.

I thought you folks might enjoy the maladrama as it unfolds and I get smacked down! He he. :)

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

A sources aren't always legitimate sources

I also have a "source" from a Conservative web site that said a volcano spread out the small animals after the Ark finally got on dry land. Too bad it was example of Poe's Law and isn't really a "real" source from Conservapedia

It is possible that volcanoes in the Mount Ararat region were able to transport the smaller animals over much greater distances than the animals could get just by walking. favicon

legitimate

__________________________

In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,

………… parent

That is true ...

but I don't rely on unreliable sources.

__________________________

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

Must be convenient

You never have to worry about people throwing your own quotes back at you. ;-)

………… parent

"Why would I lie, Why would I lie"

GoRight doesn't "rely" on "unreliable" sources, he just seemingly uses them Ad nauseum.

And see how I didn't say that "GR uses unreliable sources Ad nauseum"
I said he "seemingly uses them Ad nauseum"

See that beautiful little back door I painted myself. She's a Beauty favicon of a back door. [sorry for references, it just popped in my head and won't go away]

__________________________

In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,

………… parent

Many of us share one of his traits though.

That is that it doesn't matter if everyone else in the room/net is telling you you are wrong. if one believes themselves to be right, they don't stop believing what they do.

On the other hand, when confronted with a situation like that, most of us become voyeurs & wallflowers rather than confrontational. Or we leave and go elsewhere.

GoRight, you do love the tussle. You like an insurmountable challenge. Small wonder that you love dubya, Darth & their merry pranksters.

………… parent

If you want to start a page here

devoted to "corrections" to Wikipedia articles, be my guest =)

__________________________

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

You're gonna need a significantly bigger server. (n/t)

………… parent