Gonzales-Free Monday Open Thread
From Reuters: Gonzales has quit, NY Times reports .
About damn time! This is an Open Thread.
Submitted by Ender on Mon, 2007-08-27 07:42
Tags:
From Reuters: Gonzales has quit, NY Times reports .
About damn time! This is an Open Thread.
Comments :
CARE Rejects Federal Aid
CARE Rejects $46 Million in Food Aid
American crops shipped and monitized for cash to third world countries, through CARE, that end up hurting the local economies by keeping the price of local crops down.
Or how Federal Aid to charities hurts local economies. Good for CARE for taking this step that encompasses a longer view or reviving the local economy as opposed to short term gains that essentially are a handout to the American Farming Industry.
It is the economy, stupid.
another edition of
I am so far left that I won't vote for Hillary Clinton
and a whole bunch of idiots agree with me!
Only on a certain "mainstream" site.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Let me first say, Ender
that I'm glad both sides of the political spectrum can recognize incompetence when we see it. Perhaps the relatve quality of Clinton appointees compared to Bush ones may bring you to realize which party is better at actually running the country and which should be best suited exposing waste and opposing boondoggle spending.
Haven't folowed your link yet, but the "far left" label is kind of annoying. You can't pigeonhole every political opinion on some kind of axis and claim the farthest from the centre are kooky outliers.
I, as a liberal, don't like Hillary because:
- Every speech of hers sounds like a pander to whatever group she's talking to;
- She supports a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, which goes against the First Amendment, is a pander to oversensitive kneejerk nationalists and is a monumental waste of time and resources;
- She likes playing the victim too much. Her complaints about a "right-wing conspiracy" are innaccurate because people are hardly keeping their dislike of her secret;
- She's far too cautious and programmed. She's afraid of making a blunder and therefore never says anything interesting. It's kind of like Italy playing a World Cup match against a weaker opponent: they try to get ahead early and then run out the clock with boring defensive play. I really hate it when they do that.
- She voted for the war out of political convenience, and didn't even bother to come up with a decent explanation for doing so. I don't want a politician who will do or say anything to get elected.
- She blew it in 1993 with health care, although it's as much Bill's fault as hers. Her bill tried to please everyone and ended up being a complicated mess. Hillary, as a lawyer and not a doctor, should not have let it appear she was managing the whole thing. I have doubts as to her political skill and will to get the most important things done.
Now, which of these counter-Hillary arguments would you consider "far left"?
I'm trying to decide between Edwards and Obama, btw.
I should've added
"in the general election" to the "won't vote for Hillary" part. I certainly did not mean in the primaries.
Most of the "far-left" arguments against Hillary consistently call her republican-lite, corporatocrat, neocon, against the little people, and other silly stuff. Hillary is undoubtedly liberal no matter how much she triangulates, and is well within the mainstream of the Democratic Party.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Clinton Hit Piece?
I try to be fair and call hit pieces when I see them, and was a bit surprised when I saw this
out of the Post this morning on the way in.
Crying? Sorry, I may be a political geek, but no campaign is gonna bring me to tears because of how they treat me. I hope people realize that they can actually leave an unpleasant situation.
http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186
what a wimp
All the Hillary bashing from the Left is so predictable and so lame :)
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
How much of it is from the left vs.
how much of it is from people who only claim to be left?
That is a more realistic question.
eh
Republicans haven't opened the season on Hillary yet. They are waiting for her to win the nomination.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Does Alberto Recall Resigning
When asked to comment on when he had officially tendered his resignation, his answer was, "I don't recall.", a phrase that will likely go down in history as associated with his name.
It is the economy, stupid.
A final tribute to Alberto "Fredo" Gonzales
qui tacet consentire
I hope
Bush makes a Recess Appt right now to stick it to the Dems. Payback for the stupid witchhunts.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Yea, like Harriet Meirs
for Supreme Court Justice...
it is looking like
Chertoff is it. Would be nice if Bush just announced him being appointed today.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Ever get the feeling...
that they don't want a competent AG? I mean Chertoff is just another retard in this administration;s roster.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Maybe we could design a test question to gauge any
potential incoming AG like:
"Would you ever meet with a workplace superior at their hospital bedside, while they were under the influence of multiple opiates & painkillers and badger your unwilling superior to sign a document that would allow our president to ride roughshod over the constitution, against your superiors better judgment?"
The circle is shrinking
The pool of willing sycophants seems to be shrinking. At this stage of the game, would a competent outsider want to join this Administration's team and risk being permanently labeled as one of this group? Tough call.
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
why is Chertoff a retard?
Just curious...
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Katrina
wikipedia
brownie's "heck of a job" was facilitated by his boss's incomptence. His boss was Chertoff.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
it just seems like
Chertoff, as head of DHS, had many many other things on his plate like actually organizing DHS and reforming the Intel Community, than dealing with FEMA and watching out to all the warnings which in all honesty were very FEMA specific.
Chertoff was overseeing FEMA on paper but I think he did a lot of delegating and with good reason.
I don't think competency is part of his problem.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Under normal circumstances
I might agree with you...
But in the middle of a huge disaster like Hurricane Katrina, FEMA should have been the very top thing on his list. Just as during the middle of a terrorist attack he should give more attention to the FBI.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I would think that you would put the
integrity of the Justice Dept before partisanship Ender.
The laws of the land are what holds the country together.
Chertoff at least understands that. He was the only Justice Clinton didn't get rid of. At least Chertoff understands that DOJ is important.
Maybe your righteous brother Lieberman will head Homeland Security.
It is the economy, stupid.
we all know what is important for an AG
I think it is also important for AG to keep the what is right inviolate from the pressures of the angry Left who are simply interested in bringing this administration down.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Has it ever dawned on
"your royal partisan self" :) that 'the angry Left' actually care about the constitution and patriots and should be applauded for their efforts to keep checks and balances on the table. Wake up bud.
IN the case of Gonzo you can lump the 'angry Right' and the Left together in cheering his resignation.
Even Brit Hume says Gonzo is a crony. Is Brit Hume angry. You are damn right he is, as are many Republicans..
So you can cut the crap on this "Angry Left" bs. Even your heroine Annie Get Yer Gun Coulter, can't wait for TeamBush to leave town, though for different reasons than I have.
You seem more interested in poking sticks at the left than what is actually good for the country.
It is the economy, stupid.
that's why I'm glad to be an Indpendent;
life's too short to take this partisan nonsense too seriously --- you have to twist your ethics into pretzels to defend them; blech --- these R's aren't conservatives! they're Big Government R's and Incomptent to boot!
good riddance to Gonzales --- I'm sure the R's got a cozy gig lined up for his abundance of loyalty .. to the president, not the constitution! AG was above the man's pay grade ... back to Texas
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
I think it is going to be Orrin Hatch
.... just a hunch.
“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” --- Albert Einstein
Stupid "witchhunts"...
...that exposed the misdeeds and lies of this Atorney General, yet you admit that it's "about time" for him to resign. Hmmm.
skymutt: wise and powerful... enlightened...
Afghani poppies in bloom
story
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Critical topic for a Monday
Top five science fiction movies ever.
My list, chosen to give a balance of different genres and deliberately biased against the franchises (Matrix, Star Wars, Star Trek):
: Controversial inclusion perhaps, but ya gotta be able to laugh at yourself.
: Nice continuation of the Firefly TV show; the western flavor is enjoyable without being overdone.
: More action-packed than the original; the "monsters" are still scary as hell. T2 is similar in style (of course) and also excellent.
: What can I say, I'm a sucker for sentimentality and overcoming adversity. The future portrayed is increasingly less far-fetched.
: No film does a better job of setting an atmosphere that pervades the entire movie. Asks all the right questions but refuses to provide easy answers.
5. Galaxy Quest
4. Serenity
3. Aliens
2. Gattaca
1. Blade Runner
Comments? What's your list?
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
I was dissappointed when SciFi decided to
drop Firefly. I liked the show even though it was quirky (or more possibly partially because it was quirky).
And what's happened to the new Battlestar Galactica? It seems to have dropped off the map.
Blech
Galaxy Quest was amusing but not science fiction by any stretch. It was all parody.
While I liked Firefly, Serenity seemed weak to me. It was pretty clearly exactly what it was- an attempt to wrap up what had to be at least two seasons worth of future plotlines in two hours. And my wife and I agreed that they went way over the top with the westernized speech patterns (as opposed to firefly where they were more subtle).
Aliens kicked ass. Probably the seminal science fiction/action film.
Gattaca I hated. Boring as hell, unbelievable and saccharine.
Blade runner was simply unbelievable (in the good way). What Scott pulled off was amazing.
Here's my list (in no order):
Blade Runner
Aliens
Star Wars: a New Hope (you have to admit the first was special)
David Lynch's Dune. Maddening in that it so nails many aspects and then throws in stupid off the wall crap like the weirding modules. Still what it gets right, and the story it gets them right from, makes it a giant.
Forbidden Planet. Quite simply the classic Scifi film. 1956, precursor to star trek in many regards. Fantastic effects for the period. Leslie Nielson as a dramatic actor! Really, if you haven't seen it you really should.
Honorable mention:
Equilibrium. Good action, a nice take on a dystopian future society, decent dialog, the idea of gun-kata is cool if not realistic.
I've heard good things about Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, but I loathe Jim Carrey so I have never watched it.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I'll have to check out Forbidden Planet
Dune was good (solid acting overall) but I didn't feel like the book needed a movie. Or ten thousand sequels, for that matter.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
oh, I'm very fond of Galaxy Quest too!
such a delightful movie, and very clever .. must've seen it 4, or 5 times
Gosh, it's hard to narrow them down ... hmmm..
- the 1956 Invasion of the Body Snatchers -- still scarey
- 2001 Space Odyssey -- I first saw it when I was 9, and was like .. what the heck? but I enjoy watching it now every 10 years or so, and see a different perspective every time
- Brazil -- gobsmacking fantastic, and my contempt for bureacracy only grew
- The Incredibles -- just brilliant
that's a beginning of a list! anyone else?
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
some good ones
Body snatchers and 2001 are both good choices.
While I adore Brazil I have a hard time calling it science fiction. Ditto Incredibles but without the adoration.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I really disliked Serenity
probably because I've never seen the original Firefly. Still it was absurdly simplistic and insulted my intellect :)
They were flying to some place/galaxy far far away, and we were told it was going to be a long and dangerous trip, and then after minute of flying through some ugly looking boulders they arrived... My memory of the movie is spotty though as it did not leave a good impression on me.
The only other movie on the list that I saw was Gattaca and it is one of my favorites in general. Very moving.
I know, I know - for a sci fi geek I should've at the very least seen Aliens and Blade Runner but I am not a huge fan of sci fi movies possibly because so many of them are so poorly done. I prefer books.
On Tlaloc's suggestion I've gotten into Battlestar Galactica - which is an excellent series. I liked Star Wars, though was never a fanatic, and I enjoyed some of the newer Star Treks, though again was never really into them.
I think once the better technology is available for computer generated environments, we'll see some of the better sci fi turned into great movies... I am hopeful.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
oh yes
h/t Tlaloc - I really enjoyed David Lynch's Dune! :) And h/t Oksana for the 2001 Space Odyssey... Good stuff.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
See them. See them now.
Really, go see them. Those two pretty much define quality Scifi film. Not that there's anything wrong with books but Scifi is a genre that often benefits from visual presentation.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
heh yeah
I'll try to see them soon. I am not a big fan of the horror genre though and isn't Aliens mainly horror?
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Alien/Aliens
Alien (the first movie) was a suspense horror (and frankly it's damn boring once you know the story line and the shock is gone). Aliens (the sequel) is more of an action movie. Alien 3 was a bit of both (although not particularly successful in either).
Alien Resurrection was surprisingly good. I thought the idea of them bringing back Ripley was terrible but they actually handled it pretty well. It was more of an action romp in the vein of Aliens (although not as good).
Basically you can tell by how many aliens there are:
first movie- 1, hence mostly suspense.
second movie- many, hence action.
third movie- 1, tries to blend action and suspense.
fourth movie- many, action.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
My top five
1. Star Wars (Yes, I know, but the original was indeed original when it came out and the story's archetypes are eternal)
2. Star Trek IV: the Voyage Home (What's not to like about this one? Pure ST sentimentality and kookiness)
3. Dune (Excellent casting and effects, decent job on condensing the storyline)
4. The Last Starfighter (OK, well, yeah, but I liked it)
5. That animated short whose name escapes me, about the planet where people live in bubbles and become the heads of things (?) -- help me out here you movie buffs, Incredible Planet, maybe?
Serenity at least gave us the ending of the storyline, but I would have rather had a few more seasons of Firefly. And I loved Galaxy Quest too, a very funny movie.
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
If you are going to pick a ST movie
it has to be Wrath of Khan. ST4 did a good job with humor but Khan had everything (including one of the best movie bad guys of all time, Ricardo Montalban just nailed it).
P.S. The orginal star wars was more notable for the magic that Lucas was able to work with a shoestring budget and for the just general affability of the cast and script. It wasn't really original, seeing as it's pretty much a direct rip off of Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress, not to mention the archtypal myth elements.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Yep, that was good too
and I agree about Ricardo Montalban. But IV resonates better with me.
I forgot to add Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy (any incarnation, but the most recent is the most polished). The books are just so damned laugh-out-loud funny.
Another book that is just waiting to become a major movie blockbuster is Jitterbug Perfume. Is it SciFi? Well if not, I don't know what it would be -- weird, mostly.
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
Hitchhiker's
I liked the old BBC version of HGttG. I really didn;t care for the new version. If you want cheesy pseudo-scifi nobody does it like the BBC (all hail Dr. Who, hallowed be his moniker).
That said I couldn't really call Hitchhiker's scifi. While not strictly parody it's pretty clear the intent was always to be a farcical look at the real world, not an imagining of potential alternatives.
Haven't heard of Jitterbug Perfume. What is it?
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Battlefield Earth?
Now there is a movie...
I did like the book though.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Jitterbug Perfume
is an amazingly hysterical and poignant novel by Tom Robbins.
The main plot goes something like this: A struggling perfumer discovers an ancient perfume bottle and begins a quest through time for the elusive bottom note of this fabulous fragrance. Meanwhile, the original owners of the fragrance are also searching through time to find the bottle.
Wiki has more but it's one of those books that has to be read to be understood. It's well worth reading.
(And, I agree, all hail the intrepid Doctor and his series of companions, saviors of the Earth, the Universe, and cheesy special effects creators!)
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
I'm intrigued! jotting it down :)
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
Agree on ST2>ST4,
although I also love ST4, and actually ST6 was quite decent too. The Next Generation films were initially solid but never quite managed more than that -- they never transcended the show. Maybe it's just that TNG was a better show, so expectations were higher for the movies.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
TNG
Better show? Blech. It took them three seasons to have their first actually good episode (Yesterday's Enterprise). DS9 on the other hand was fantastic. Voyager had some good moments but not great. Enterprise blew chunks.
As far as the films- First Contact actually managed to do something Trek had never really managed before- the horror genre. It might have really worked if they had not had the slapstick sub plot on the surface interrupting all the time. Generations was just awful (good lord the plot holes!), Nemesis was totally forgettable, and calling Insurrection "vapid" would be a kindness.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
oh, yeah! The Last Starfighter! good one
I'd add V for Vendetta too -- I really enjoyed that V -- (played by an actor from the Matrix series), which I'd add too, though it got a bit tedious, or I got jaded? who knows, but initially I was wowed
Star Wars? initially wowed, and then I dozed off; the History Channel did a retrsospective on the series' mythologies/symbolisms, and that was more interesting, to me
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
V
You should read the graphic novel of V for Vendetta. So much better than the movie. So very much better. It's one of the graphic novels I use as an example that the millieu can actually be great literature (along with Sandman, Dark Knight Returns, and Watchmen).
Unfortunately the flaws of the movie become really glaring once you've seen the story done right.
BTW the actor was Hugo Weaving. He played Agent Smith in the Matrix, Elrond in Lord of the Rings, and a transvestite in Priscilla Queen of the Desert. He may have a fish face but the guy's got range :)
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
thanks for the info .. yes, Hugo Weaving;
his voice was so fantastic in V, I found it alone mesmerizing; and I'm not much of a reader, frankly -- the 25% of the American sheeple who don't read! (though Ender 'knows' it's much more ... bwahaha) --- I read mostly on the Internets, which limits content choices.
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
It's a graphic novel
we aren't talking Cervantes 1400 pages of small type Don Quixote here.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
since u put it so nicely, I'll keep it in mind
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
yeah I am slowly joining you tubazoids
in not reading much outside the internet. Just don't have much time with the Net constantly interrupting my thought processes (what little that I have)...
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
yup! it crept up on me ... between work,
and this darn blogging, which I enjoy, and especially, since I don't have a long commute anymore, I really just read on vacations now .... w/the Internets, I don't even buy the local papers anymore; read them, and more, online too
Once, I couldn't have imagined a Sunday w/o the NYTimes!, but life goes on :)
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
I thought V
was complete trash and lost respect for whatshername in the main role. Socialist/Terrorist glorifying nonsense that tried to slime conservatism in general throwing in some absurd touchy feeling lesbian subplot.
I wanted to puke during that movie and I still don't know why I didn't walk out.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
lol! I don't know why you ever walked in!
I didn't take all that anti-Thatcherism hippy dippy pinko stuff too seriously -- but I'm also wary of Big Government, no matter it's partisanship; to me V was very visually entertaining, and I liked V's pad -- it's just a movie!
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
Yup, I also liked the last starfighter
but I saw it when I was a kid, and I figured that had a lot to do with why I found the story interesting.
I liked the first matrix, but then lost interest. The best star wars movie was really Empire but it isn't complete on its own, it's a bridge to set up the finale. But yeah, the original Star Wars were pretty good.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
agree about the Matrix
Liked the first, tolerated the 2nd, and actually watched the third but it was pretty absurd imo.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
I still haven't seen the third matrix
or the third Godfather -- in both cases enough people have told me not to that I avoided them even though I'm a little curious how everything ends.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
The 3rd Godfather is the more disappointing
of the two, imo, simply by comparison to the 1st 2, of course .... Coppola!!!!!
Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous
SF movies
I agree with most of the titles listed so far (though I enjoyed the SciFi channel Dune miniseries much more than the movie). A couple that I would add, not necesarily Top 5 caliber, but definitely worth seeing:
Children of Men - brilliant, moving portrayal of hope in a grim grim future
12 Monkeys - haven't seen this in a long time, but I am a huge Terry Gilliam fan, and this is up there with Brazil. Also the movie that made me begin to realize that Brad Pitt wasn't just a pretty boy, but a damned good actor. And I like Bruce Willis alot, too, which brings us to:
The Fifth Element - for plain old schlocky fun
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
yeah 5th element!
And for some reason I remembered Judge Dredd which was kinda entertaining...
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
For crappy but awesome Stallone movies
I insist that Demolition Man
be given its rightful place of honor at the head of the line.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
agreed
excellent find! :)
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Yes!
Demolition Man and Judge Dredd. Stallone at his finest!
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
I'm not a huge Stallone or Snipes fan,
but Judge Dredd was classic. Taco Bell won the resturant wars....
A movie in which
I like both Stallone and Snipes. Quite the oddity.
"I must have done something right in a former life... can't think of what it could have been..."
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Absolutely
All excellent choices. Of course, I'm biased because I also like Bruce Willis quite a bit.
I wanna read Children of Men when I have time. Maybe next summer.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
SL Meeting Tonight
Meeting tonight in Second Life
Tonight we start at 6pm SLT (Pacific Time) and go for two hours or until the last person leaves. Arrive early if you want to; I'll put the chessboard up.
Here's an online link to location. To use, get into SL, then click on this link and allow the code to run, then go back into SL. The world map will be displayed with this location. Click on the Teleport button on the map.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Sifton/34/57/63
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
Another way we aren't helping in Iraq
story
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
A possible Iraq escape
this blog raises an interesting possible out for us from Iraq.
If elements (allawi or other) stage a coup in Iraq we could then distance ourselves from the new government and basically claim that democracy is now impossible and get out, laying the blame on the new government.
Not a particularly honest manuever but one that I think could get broad support in congress since it involves both getting out and also allows war supporters to claim that they would have won "if only..."
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Stupid ads
When did dKos get that ad space in middle of the page, and right after the text in a diary? (It's Reid and Pelosi as sheep right now.) So obnoxious. Redstate did that a long time ago and it makes it really annoying to read...
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
fairly recent...
It's obnoxious but effective I'd think.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
What's stupid about portraying
Reid and Pelosi as sheep? From the kook left perspective (which is pretty much the same as anyone on the left's perspective as far as I can tell) they ARE sheep. I promised to reform things and the most that they have accomplished is taking over the "good office space".
Business as usual, otherwise. Losers all around.
Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree
Strictly a meta complaint
I don't care about what the ad is, I care about the ad being there at all.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
Certainly the republicans in congress
who have not allowed any votes to occur they object to aren't part of the problem, in your view.
It's funny. When Republicans ran the show, Democrats were obstructionists. Now that Democrats run the show, they're just losers.
Can you actually hold a consistent thought without partisanship blinding you? Do you even see how you come across?
Funny.
No more so than you seemed to think the Democrats were when they were doing it. I believe that they viewed it as respecting the minority party or some such gibberish. Bu