Gonzales-Free Monday Open Thread

From Reuters: Gonzales has quit, NY Times reports .

About damn time! This is an Open Thread.

Comments :

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

CARE Rejects Federal Aid

CARE Rejects $46 Million in Food Aid

American crops shipped and monitized for cash to third world countries, through CARE, that end up hurting the local economies by keeping the price of local crops down.

CARE joins a growing group of organizations who say U.S. agricultural surplus hurts local economies. The CARE decision to phase out grain donations began back in 2005 and is causing a stir as Congress debates the Farm Bill which is reauthorized every five years.

Or how Federal Aid to charities hurts local economies. Good for CARE for taking this step that encompasses a longer view or reviving the local economy as opposed to short term gains that essentially are a handout to the American Farming Industry.

It is the economy, stupid.

…………

another edition of

I am so far left that I won't vote for Hillary Clinton and a whole bunch of idiots agree with me!

Only on a certain "mainstream" site.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

…………

Let me first say, Ender

that I'm glad both sides of the political spectrum can recognize incompetence when we see it. Perhaps the relatve quality of Clinton appointees compared to Bush ones may bring you to realize which party is better at actually running the country and which should be best suited exposing waste and opposing boondoggle spending.

Haven't folowed your link yet, but the "far left" label is kind of annoying. You can't pigeonhole every political opinion on some kind of axis and claim the farthest from the centre are kooky outliers.

I, as a liberal, don't like Hillary because:

- Every speech of hers sounds like a pander to whatever group she's talking to;

- She supports a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, which goes against the First Amendment, is a pander to oversensitive kneejerk nationalists and is a monumental waste of time and resources;

- She likes playing the victim too much. Her complaints about a "right-wing conspiracy" are innaccurate because people are hardly keeping their dislike of her secret;

- She's far too cautious and programmed. She's afraid of making a blunder and therefore never says anything interesting. It's kind of like Italy playing a World Cup match against a weaker opponent: they try to get ahead early and then run out the clock with boring defensive play. I really hate it when they do that.

- She voted for the war out of political convenience, and didn't even bother to come up with a decent explanation for doing so. I don't want a politician who will do or say anything to get elected.

- She blew it in 1993 with health care, although it's as much Bill's fault as hers. Her bill tried to please everyone and ended up being a complicated mess. Hillary, as a lawyer and not a doctor, should not have let it appear she was managing the whole thing. I have doubts as to her political skill and will to get the most important things done.

Now, which of these counter-Hillary arguments would you consider "far left"?

I'm trying to decide between Edwards and Obama, btw.

………… parent

I should've added

"in the general election" to the "won't vote for Hillary" part. I certainly did not mean in the primaries.

Most of the "far-left" arguments against Hillary consistently call her republican-lite, corporatocrat, neocon, against the little people, and other silly stuff. Hillary is undoubtedly liberal no matter how much she triangulates, and is well within the mainstream of the Democratic Party.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Clinton Hit Piece?

I try to be fair and call hit pieces when I see them, and was a bit surprised when I saw this out of the Post this morning on the way in.

August 27, 2007 -- A former "die-hard" backer of Hillary Rodham Clinton says he switched his allegiance to Barack Obama after spending three weeks volunteering for the former first lady's Iowa office, and witnessing abusive higher-ups and crying campaigners.

Crying? Sorry, I may be a political geek, but no campaign is gonna bring me to tears because of how they treat me. I hope people realize that they can actually leave an unpleasant situation.

http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186

…………

what a wimp

All the Hillary bashing from the Left is so predictable and so lame :)

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

How much of it is from the left vs.

how much of it is from people who only claim to be left?

That is a more realistic question.

………… parent

eh

Republicans haven't opened the season on Hillary yet. They are waiting for her to win the nomination.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Does Alberto Recall Resigning

When asked to comment on when he had officially tendered his resignation, his answer was, "I don't recall.", a phrase that will likely go down in history as associated with his name.

It is the economy, stupid.

…………

A final tribute to Alberto "Fredo" Gonzales

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

I hope

Bush makes a Recess Appt right now to stick it to the Dems. Payback for the stupid witchhunts.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

…………

Yea, like Harriet Meirs

for Supreme Court Justice...

………… parent

it is looking like

Chertoff is it. Would be nice if Bush just announced him being appointed today.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Ever get the feeling...

that they don't want a competent AG? I mean Chertoff is just another retard in this administration;s roster.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Maybe we could design a test question to gauge any

potential incoming AG like:

"Would you ever meet with a workplace superior at their hospital bedside, while they were under the influence of multiple opiates & painkillers and badger your unwilling superior to sign a document that would allow our president to ride roughshod over the constitution, against your superiors better judgment?"

………… parent

The circle is shrinking

The pool of willing sycophants seems to be shrinking. At this stage of the game, would a competent outsider want to join this Administration's team and risk being permanently labeled as one of this group? Tough call.

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

why is Chertoff a retard?

Just curious...

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Katrina

Most recently Chertoff has managed the FEMA response to Hurricane Katrina. On the third of September, several days after the initial strike of the hurricane many (including the New Orleans mayor, Ray Nagin) indicated severe dissatisfaction with the response from Washington, citing the delay between the general knowledge of the storm's likely impact and any effective federal response. Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco declared a state of emergency on August 26 [1]; a week later, New Orleans remained in a state of chaos.

While defending the federal government's response in a September 3, 2005 press conference, Chertoff asserted "That 'perfect storm' of a combination of catastrophes exceeded the foresight of the planners, and maybe anybody's foresight." Warnings of the levee's vulnerability to Cat 4 and above hurricanes had in fact come for years from experts in the private sector as well as government agencies at all levels, including FEMA itself, who had identified a disaster such as this as one of the three most likely catastrophes to strike the US. CNN: [2] Houston Chronicle: [3]. It is true that disaster plans did not contemplate the particular confluence of events: exposure to Cat 3 winds and storm surge that did not overtop the levees but nevertheless resulted in a major breach. Furthermore, plans that contemplated a Cat 4 or worse storm were inadequate and relied primarily on evacuation.

wikipedia

brownie's "heck of a job" was facilitated by his boss's incomptence. His boss was Chertoff.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

it just seems like

Chertoff, as head of DHS, had many many other things on his plate like actually organizing DHS and reforming the Intel Community, than dealing with FEMA and watching out to all the warnings which in all honesty were very FEMA specific.

Chertoff was overseeing FEMA on paper but I think he did a lot of delegating and with good reason.

I don't think competency is part of his problem.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Under normal circumstances

I might agree with you...

But in the middle of a huge disaster like Hurricane Katrina, FEMA should have been the very top thing on his list. Just as during the middle of a terrorist attack he should give more attention to the FBI.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

I would think that you would put the

integrity of the Justice Dept before partisanship Ender.

The laws of the land are what holds the country together.

Chertoff at least understands that. He was the only Justice Clinton didn't get rid of. At least Chertoff understands that DOJ is important.

Maybe your righteous brother Lieberman will head Homeland Security.

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

we all know what is important for an AG

I think it is also important for AG to keep the what is right inviolate from the pressures of the angry Left who are simply interested in bringing this administration down.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Has it ever dawned on

"your royal partisan self" :) that 'the angry Left' actually care about the constitution and patriots and should be applauded for their efforts to keep checks and balances on the table. Wake up bud.

IN the case of Gonzo you can lump the 'angry Right' and the Left together in cheering his resignation.

Even Brit Hume says Gonzo is a crony. Is Brit Hume angry. You are damn right he is, as are many Republicans..

So you can cut the crap on this "Angry Left" bs. Even your heroine Annie Get Yer Gun Coulter, can't wait for TeamBush to leave town, though for different reasons than I have.

You seem more interested in poking sticks at the left than what is actually good for the country.

It is the economy, stupid.

………… parent

that's why I'm glad to be an Indpendent;

life's too short to take this partisan nonsense too seriously --- you have to twist your ethics into pretzels to defend them; blech --- these R's aren't conservatives! they're Big Government R's and Incomptent to boot!

good riddance to Gonzales --- I'm sure the R's got a cozy gig lined up for his abundance of loyalty .. to the president, not the constitution! AG was above the man's pay grade ... back to Texas

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

I think it is going to be Orrin Hatch

.... just a hunch.

“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” --- Albert Einstein

………… parent

Stupid "witchhunts"...

...that exposed the misdeeds and lies of this Atorney General, yet you admit that it's "about time"  for him to resign.  Hmmm.

………… parent

Afghani poppies in bloom

KABUL (Reuters) - Opium production has soared to "frightening record levels" in Afghanistan, which now has more land producing drugs than Columbia, Bolivia and Peru combined, the United Nations said on Monday.

Afghanistan is locked in a vicious circle where drug money feeds both the Taliban insurgency and official corruption which in turn weaken the government's hold of large parts of the country and allows more opium to be produced.

The area of Afghan land where opium poppies are grown rose by 17 percent to 193,000 hectares in 2007 from 165,000 last year and this year's harvest was 8,200 tonnes, up from 6,100 tonnes in 2006, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) said.

Afghanistan produced 93 percent of the world's opium in 2007, up from 92 percent last year, the annual UNODC report said.

"No other country has produced narcotics on such a deadly scale since China in the 19th century," a UNODC statement said.

Most Afghan opium is processed to make heroin and smuggled out of the country to Europe and the Middle East where it fuels addiction and crime.

Opium production in Afghanistan is concentrated in the south of the country where the Taliban insurgency is most virulent.

...

Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar drastically reduced opium production in Afghanistan during his last year in power, issuing a religious edict banning the crop and threatening harsh punishments in areas the movement held under its strict control.

Now, the report said, the Taliban had reversed its policy.

"What used to be considered a sin is now being encouraged," Costa said.

story

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

Critical topic for a Monday

Top five science fiction movies ever.

My list, chosen to give a balance of different genres and deliberately biased against the franchises (Matrix, Star Wars, Star Trek):
5. Galaxy Quest : Controversial inclusion perhaps, but ya gotta be able to laugh at yourself.
4. Serenity : Nice continuation of the Firefly TV show; the western flavor is enjoyable without being overdone.
3. Aliens : More action-packed than the original; the "monsters" are still scary as hell. T2 is similar in style (of course) and also excellent.
2. Gattaca : What can I say, I'm a sucker for sentimentality and overcoming adversity. The future portrayed is increasingly less far-fetched.
1. Blade Runner : No film does a better job of setting an atmosphere that pervades the entire movie. Asks all the right questions but refuses to provide easy answers.

Comments? What's your list?

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

I was dissappointed when SciFi decided to

drop Firefly. I liked the show even though it was quirky (or more possibly partially because it was quirky).

And what's happened to the new Battlestar Galactica? It seems to have dropped off the map.

………… parent

Blech

Galaxy Quest was amusing but not science fiction by any stretch. It was all parody.

While I liked Firefly, Serenity seemed weak to me. It was pretty clearly exactly what it was- an attempt to wrap up what had to be at least two seasons worth of future plotlines in two hours. And my wife and I agreed that they went way over the top with the westernized speech patterns (as opposed to firefly where they were more subtle).

Aliens kicked ass. Probably the seminal science fiction/action film.

Gattaca I hated. Boring as hell, unbelievable and saccharine.

Blade runner was simply unbelievable (in the good way). What Scott pulled off was amazing.

Here's my list (in no order):

Blade Runner

Aliens

Star Wars: a New Hope (you have to admit the first was special)

David Lynch's Dune. Maddening in that it so nails many aspects and then throws in stupid off the wall crap like the weirding modules. Still what it gets right, and the story it gets them right from, makes it a giant.

Forbidden Planet. Quite simply the classic Scifi film. 1956, precursor to star trek in many regards. Fantastic effects for the period. Leslie Nielson as a dramatic actor! Really, if you haven't seen it you really should.

Honorable mention:
Equilibrium. Good action, a nice take on a dystopian future society, decent dialog, the idea of gun-kata is cool if not realistic.

I've heard good things about Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, but I loathe Jim Carrey so I have never watched it.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

I'll have to check out Forbidden Planet

Dune was good (solid acting overall) but I didn't feel like the book needed a movie. Or ten thousand sequels, for that matter.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

oh, I'm very fond of Galaxy Quest too!

such a delightful movie, and very clever .. must've seen it 4, or 5 times

Gosh, it's hard to narrow them down ... hmmm..

- the 1956 Invasion of the Body Snatchers -- still scarey
- 2001 Space Odyssey -- I first saw it when I was 9, and was like .. what the heck? but I enjoy watching it now every 10 years or so, and see a different perspective every time
- Brazil -- gobsmacking fantastic, and my contempt for bureacracy only grew
- The Incredibles -- just brilliant

that's a beginning of a list! anyone else?

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

some good ones

Body snatchers and 2001 are both good choices.

While I adore Brazil I have a hard time calling it science fiction. Ditto Incredibles but without the adoration.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

I really disliked Serenity

probably because I've never seen the original Firefly. Still it was absurdly simplistic and insulted my intellect :)

They were flying to some place/galaxy far far away, and we were told it was going to be a long and dangerous trip, and then after minute of flying through some ugly looking boulders they arrived... My memory of the movie is spotty though as it did not leave a good impression on me.

The only other movie on the list that I saw was Gattaca and it is one of my favorites in general. Very moving.

I know, I know - for a sci fi geek I should've at the very least seen Aliens and Blade Runner but I am not a huge fan of sci fi movies possibly because so many of them are so poorly done. I prefer books.

On Tlaloc's suggestion I've gotten into Battlestar Galactica - which is an excellent series. I liked Star Wars, though was never a fanatic, and I enjoyed some of the newer Star Treks, though again was never really into them.

I think once the better technology is available for computer generated environments, we'll see some of the better sci fi turned into great movies... I am hopeful.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

oh yes

h/t Tlaloc - I really enjoyed David Lynch's Dune! :) And h/t Oksana for the 2001 Space Odyssey... Good stuff.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

See them. See them now.

I know, I know - for a sci fi geek I should've at the very least seen Aliens and Blade Runner but I am not a huge fan of sci fi movies possibly because so many of them are so poorly done.

Really, go see them. Those two pretty much define quality Scifi film. Not that there's anything wrong with books but Scifi is a genre that often benefits from visual presentation.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

heh yeah

I'll try to see them soon. I am not a big fan of the horror genre though and isn't Aliens mainly horror?

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Alien/Aliens

Alien (the first movie) was a suspense horror (and frankly it's damn boring once you know the story line and the shock is gone). Aliens (the sequel) is more of an action movie. Alien 3 was a bit of both (although not particularly successful in either).

Alien Resurrection was surprisingly good. I thought the idea of them bringing back Ripley was terrible but they actually handled it pretty well. It was more of an action romp in the vein of Aliens (although not as good).

Basically you can tell by how many aliens there are:
first movie- 1, hence mostly suspense.
second movie- many, hence action.
third movie- 1, tries to blend action and suspense.
fourth movie- many, action.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

My top five

1. Star Wars (Yes, I know, but the original was indeed original when it came out and the story's archetypes are eternal)
2. Star Trek IV: the Voyage Home (What's not to like about this one? Pure ST sentimentality and kookiness)
3. Dune (Excellent casting and effects, decent job on condensing the storyline)
4. The Last Starfighter (OK, well, yeah, but I liked it)
5. That animated short whose name escapes me, about the planet where people live in bubbles and become the heads of things (?) -- help me out here you movie buffs, Incredible Planet, maybe?

Serenity at least gave us the ending of the storyline, but I would have rather had a few more seasons of Firefly. And I loved Galaxy Quest too, a very funny movie.

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

If you are going to pick a ST movie

it has to be Wrath of Khan. ST4 did a good job with humor but Khan had everything (including one of the best movie bad guys of all time, Ricardo Montalban just nailed it).

P.S. The orginal star wars was more notable for the magic that Lucas was able to work with a shoestring budget and for the just general affability of the cast and script. It wasn't really original, seeing as it's pretty much a direct rip off of Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress, not to mention the archtypal myth elements.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Yep, that was good too

and I agree about Ricardo Montalban. But IV resonates better with me.

I forgot to add Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy (any incarnation, but the most recent is the most polished). The books are just so damned laugh-out-loud funny.

Another book that is just waiting to become a major movie blockbuster is Jitterbug Perfume. Is it SciFi? Well if not, I don't know what it would be -- weird, mostly.

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

Hitchhiker's

I liked the old BBC version of HGttG. I really didn;t care for the new version. If you want cheesy pseudo-scifi nobody does it like the BBC (all hail Dr. Who, hallowed be his moniker).

That said I couldn't really call Hitchhiker's scifi. While not strictly parody it's pretty clear the intent was always to be a farcical look at the real world, not an imagining of potential alternatives.

Haven't heard of Jitterbug Perfume. What is it?

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Battlefield Earth?

Now there is a movie...

I did like the book though.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Jitterbug Perfume

is an amazingly hysterical and poignant novel by Tom Robbins.

The main plot goes something like this: A struggling perfumer discovers an ancient perfume bottle and begins a quest through time for the elusive bottom note of this fabulous fragrance. Meanwhile, the original owners of the fragrance are also searching through time to find the bottle.

Wiki has more but it's one of those books that has to be read to be understood. It's well worth reading.

(And, I agree, all hail the intrepid Doctor and his series of companions, saviors of the Earth, the Universe, and cheesy special effects creators!)

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

I'm intrigued! jotting it down :)

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

Agree on ST2>ST4,

although I also love ST4, and actually ST6 was quite decent too. The Next Generation films were initially solid but never quite managed more than that -- they never transcended the show. Maybe it's just that TNG was a better show, so expectations were higher for the movies.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

TNG

Better show? Blech. It took them three seasons to have their first actually good episode (Yesterday's Enterprise). DS9 on the other hand was fantastic. Voyager had some good moments but not great. Enterprise blew chunks.

As far as the films- First Contact actually managed to do something Trek had never really managed before- the horror genre. It might have really worked if they had not had the slapstick sub plot on the surface interrupting all the time. Generations was just awful (good lord the plot holes!), Nemesis was totally forgettable, and calling Insurrection "vapid" would be a kindness.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

oh, yeah! The Last Starfighter! good one

I'd add V for Vendetta too -- I really enjoyed that V -- (played by an actor from the Matrix series), which I'd add too, though it got a bit tedious, or I got jaded? who knows, but initially I was wowed

Star Wars? initially wowed, and then I dozed off; the History Channel did a retrsospective on the series' mythologies/symbolisms, and that was more interesting, to me

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

V

You should read the graphic novel of V for Vendetta. So much better than the movie. So very much better. It's one of the graphic novels I use as an example that the millieu can actually be great literature (along with Sandman, Dark Knight Returns, and Watchmen).

Unfortunately the flaws of the movie become really glaring once you've seen the story done right.

BTW the actor was Hugo Weaving. He played Agent Smith in the Matrix, Elrond in Lord of the Rings, and a transvestite in Priscilla Queen of the Desert. He may have a fish face but the guy's got range :)

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

thanks for the info .. yes, Hugo Weaving;

his voice was so fantastic in V, I found it alone mesmerizing; and I'm not much of a reader, frankly -- the 25% of the American sheeple who don't read! (though Ender 'knows' it's much more ... bwahaha) --- I read mostly on the Internets, which limits content choices.

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

It's a graphic novel

we aren't talking Cervantes 1400 pages of small type Don Quixote here.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

since u put it so nicely, I'll keep it in mind

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

yeah I am slowly joining you tubazoids

in not reading much outside the internet. Just don't have much time with the Net constantly interrupting my thought processes (what little that I have)...

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

yup! it crept up on me ... between work,

and this darn blogging, which I enjoy, and especially, since I don't have a long commute anymore, I really just read on vacations now .... w/the Internets, I don't even buy the local papers anymore; read them, and more, online too

Once, I couldn't have imagined a Sunday w/o the NYTimes!, but life goes on :)

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

I thought V

was complete trash and lost respect for whatshername in the main role. Socialist/Terrorist glorifying nonsense that tried to slime conservatism in general throwing in some absurd touchy feeling lesbian subplot.

I wanted to puke during that movie and I still don't know why I didn't walk out.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

lol! I don't know why you ever walked in!

I didn't take all that anti-Thatcherism hippy dippy pinko stuff too seriously -- but I'm also wary of Big Government, no matter it's partisanship; to me V was very visually entertaining, and I liked V's pad -- it's just a movie!

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

Yup, I also liked the last starfighter

but I saw it when I was a kid, and I figured that had a lot to do with why I found the story interesting.

I liked the first matrix, but then lost interest. The best star wars movie was really Empire but it isn't complete on its own, it's a bridge to set up the finale. But yeah, the original Star Wars were pretty good.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

agree about the Matrix

Liked the first, tolerated the 2nd, and actually watched the third but it was pretty absurd imo.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

I still haven't seen the third matrix

or the third Godfather -- in both cases enough people have told me not to that I avoided them even though I'm a little curious how everything ends.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

The 3rd Godfather is the more disappointing

of the two, imo, simply by comparison to the 1st 2, of course .... Coppola!!!!!

Politics is a clash of interests masquerading as a clash of principles. – Anonymous

………… parent

SF movies

I agree with most of the titles listed so far (though I enjoyed the SciFi channel Dune miniseries much more than the movie). A couple that I would add, not necesarily Top 5 caliber, but definitely worth seeing:

Children of Men - brilliant, moving portrayal of hope in a grim grim future

12 Monkeys - haven't seen this in a long time, but I am a huge Terry Gilliam fan, and this is up there with Brazil. Also the movie that made me begin to realize that Brad Pitt wasn't just a pretty boy, but a damned good actor. And I like Bruce Willis alot, too, which brings us to:

The Fifth Element - for plain old schlocky fun

We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki

………… parent

yeah 5th element!

And for some reason I remembered Judge Dredd which was kinda entertaining...

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

For crappy but awesome Stallone movies

I insist that Demolition Man be given its rightful place of honor at the head of the line.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

agreed

excellent find! :)

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Yes!

Demolition Man and Judge Dredd. Stallone at his finest!

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

I'm not a huge Stallone or Snipes fan,

but Judge Dredd was classic. Taco Bell won the resturant wars....

………… parent

A movie in which

I like both Stallone and Snipes. Quite the oddity.

"I must have done something right in a former life... can't think of what it could have been..."

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Absolutely

All excellent choices. Of course, I'm biased because I also like Bruce Willis quite a bit.

I wanna read Children of Men when I have time. Maybe next summer.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

SL Meeting Tonight

Meeting tonight in Second Life

Tonight we start at 6pm SLT (Pacific Time) and go for two hours or until the last person leaves. Arrive early if you want to; I'll put the chessboard up.

Here's an online link to location. To use, get into SL, then click on this link and allow the code to run, then go back into SL. The world map will be displayed with this location. Click on the Teleport button on the map.

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Sifton/34/57/63

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

…………

Another way we aren't helping in Iraq

BAGHDAD — Iraq's deadly insurgent groups have financed their war against U.S. troops in part with hundreds of thousands of dollars in U.S. rebuilding funds that they've extorted from Iraqi contractors in Anbar province.

The payments, in return for the insurgents' allowing supplies to move and construction work to begin, have taken place since the earliest projects in 2003, Iraqi contractors, politicians and interpreters involved with reconstruction efforts said.

A fresh round of rebuilding spurred by the U.S. military's recent alliance with some Anbar tribes — 200 new projects are scheduled — provides another opportunity for militant groups such as al Qaeda in Iraq to siphon off more U.S. money, contractors and politicians warn.

"Now we're back to the same old story in Anbar. The Americans are handing out contracts and jobs to terrorists, bandits and gangsters," said Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Suleiman, the deputy leader of the Dulaim, the largest and most powerful tribe in Anbar. He was involved in several U.S. rebuilding contracts in the early days of the war, but is now a harsh critic of the U.S. presence.

story

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

A possible Iraq escape

this blog raises an interesting possible out for us from Iraq.

If elements (allawi or other) stage a coup in Iraq we could then distance ourselves from the new government and basically claim that democracy is now impossible and get out, laying the blame on the new government.

Not a particularly honest manuever but one that I think could get broad support in congress since it involves both getting out and also allows war supporters to claim that they would have won "if only..."

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

Stupid ads

When did dKos get that ad space in middle of the page, and right after the text in a diary? (It's Reid and Pelosi as sheep right now.) So obnoxious. Redstate did that a long time ago and it makes it really annoying to read...

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

fairly recent...

It's obnoxious but effective I'd think.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

What's stupid about portraying

Reid and Pelosi as sheep?  From the kook left perspective (which is pretty much the same as anyone on the left's perspective as far as I can tell) they ARE sheep.  I promised to reform things and the most that they have accomplished is taking over the "good office space".

Business as usual, otherwise.  Losers all around.

Republican Maverick at Large
-4:Strongly Disagree; 0:Meh; +4:Strongly Agree

………… parent

Strictly a meta complaint

I don't care about what the ad is, I care about the ad being there at all.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

Certainly the republicans in congress

who have not allowed any votes to occur they object to aren't part of the problem, in your view.

It's funny. When Republicans ran the show, Democrats were obstructionists. Now that Democrats run the show, they're just losers.

Can you actually hold a consistent thought without partisanship blinding you? Do you even see how you come across?

………… parent

Funny.

Certainly the republicans in congress who have not allowed any votes to occur they object to aren't part of the problem, in your view.

No more so than you seemed to think the Democrats were when they were doing it.  I believe that they viewed it as respecting the minority party or some such gibberish.  Bu